Hi, and another question: Is there any documentation of the width of the basic types? I e.g. expect the changeset numbers to increase pretty fast. Currently we are still quite far from busting the 32 (31) bit space with the node ids (we are imho somewhere close to 400 million nodes and 31 bits is sufficient for 2 billion nodes).
But the changeset ids may grow much faster and 2 billion updates may be reached pretty soon. Should we be using 64 bit integers for ids already? Till Am Freitag 10 April 2009 schrieb Thomas Wood: > 2009/4/10 Till Harbaum / Lists <li...@harbaum.org>: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > osm2go now seems to work fine with the test server. I have not tested this > > very much and will do so the next days. But so far libcurl and your > > server seem to cooperate nicely. > > Fantastic, I did have some worries a while ago whether the requests > were getting through to the code properly. The upstream mod_rails > upgrade seems to have fixed this nicely. > > > Are the error messages documented somewhere? I had the problem with > > the 0.5 server that some error messages were plain ascii text while some > > were html. Do you return all error messages in some standard format? > > Errors are either caught and handled by the OSM software, or not at > all and thus caught by Ruby and handled by Rails. > When handled by us, I believe we try and return a plain text error > message and appropriate status code. > When it's a Ruby/Rails exception, it's probably going to return a > stack trace in html (focused towards browser use), and the 500 > internal server error status code. > > > > Thanks, > > Till > > > > Am Freitag 10 April 2009 schrieb Thomas Wood: > >> Thanks for bringing this up, for future reference, the exact error was: > >> [2009-04-09 20:39:38.334164 #1380] ArgumentError (Must specify a > >> string with one or more characters): > >> > >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/libxml-ruby-1.1.3/lib/libxml/parser.rb:82:in > >> `string' > >> > >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/libxml-ruby-1.1.3/lib/libxml/parser.rb:82:in > >> `string' > >> /app/models/node.rb:67:in `from_xml' > >> /app/controllers/node_controller.rb:72:in `delete' > >> > >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:1166:in > >> `send' > >> ... more traceback ... > >> > >> This is related to the change in libxml version, meaning that anything > >> we try and parse must not have zero length. A similar issue was fixed > >> in r14241. > >> > >> I'll get to fixing this case also, and seeing if I can find others. > >> > >> 2009/4/9 Till Harbaum / Lists <li...@harbaum.org>: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > you should check your server log again. I just tried to delete a node > >> > without > >> > specifying a changeset. The result was a frightening lengthy mixture of > >> > ruby > >> > error messages, html error messages etc etc ... > >> > > >> > Till > >> > > >> > Am Donnerstag 09 April 2009 schrieb Thomas Wood: > >> >> Thanks for the sample request, I've updated the rails module in > >> >> apache, and the request seems to be functioning fine for me now, do > >> >> you want to try again? > >> >> > >> >> Looking into this error also allowed me to find a bug with the > >> >> changeset browing on the website section of the code, too! > >> >> > >> >> 2009/4/9 Till Harbaum / Lists <li...@harbaum.org>: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > i get the same results using the command line curl. I do this: > >> >> > > >> >> > curl -u mylogin:mypassword -H "Expect:" -i -o result.txt > >> >> > -Tchangeset.xml > >> >> > http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/create > >> >> > > >> >> > And the changeset.xml is attached. > >> >> > > >> >> > I sometimes get server errors 500 with this and sometimes just an > >> >> > empty > >> >> > reply. This should be giving me a changeset id in return, shouldn't > >> >> > it? > >> >> > > >> >> > What's wrong with this request? > >> >> > > >> >> > Till > >> >> > > >> >> > Am Donnerstag 09 April 2009 schrieb Thomas Wood: > >> >> >> I've done a quick search through the server's log, and can find 401 > >> >> >> and 500 responses both logged in the apache log. The rails log only > >> >> >> shows 401 responses and not the 500s, so there's something odd > >> >> >> happening between apache and rails. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> However, other requests to this method this evening have been > >> >> >> functioning correctly according to the logs. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 2009/4/8 Till Harbaum / Lists <li...@harbaum.org>: > >> >> >> > Hi, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > sending this request: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > PUT /api/0.6/changeset/create HTTP/1.1 > >> >> >> > Authorization: Basic xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > User-Agent: osm2go-libcurl/0.6.14 > >> >> >> > Host: api06.dev.openstreetmap.org > >> >> >> > Accept: */* > >> >> >> > Content-Length: 163 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >> >> >> > <osm> > >> >> >> > <changeset> > >> >> >> > <tag k="created_by" v="osm2go v0.6.14"/> > >> >> >> > <tag k="comment" v="Kommentar"/> > >> >> >> > </changeset> > >> >> >> > </osm> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > i either get an "internal server error 500" or no reply at all. > >> >> >> > What is wrong with this request (despite the > >> >> >> > Auth i xxx'ed out)? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Till > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> > dev mailing list > >> >> >> > dev@openstreetmap.org > >> >> >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
