2009/7/16 Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> > Hi, > > Shaun McDonald wrote: > >> Yes you can do it, though I don't have a good reason for doing such a >> thing. >> > > I don't have an idea where one would add a relation as a member to itself, > but circular references could e.g. happen if you were to create a relation > for a city and then have another city as a member with role="twinned_with" - > this would obviously be circular. > > I'd be curious to know how the api calculates the bounding box of such a relation, assuming the api definition is "the smallest bbox containg all children bbox'es".
Does the api have special tests to avoid infinite recursion? - Chris -
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
