Jon Burgess wrote: > The main thing which I still believe is broken is support for the > advanced multipolygon with multiple outer rings. I have a fairly simple
Which is exactly why I said the classic single-outer-n-inner rings would definately work. > The other which I'm uncertain about is using a single way for both a > polygon and for a linear feature running along the boundary. At one I'm not for that, too. That Italian example in trac has been around for months, and I might just 'fix it' by demultiplexing the tertiary and landuse real soon. > - Relations with a name= tag. The Wiki says they should be entirely > untagged. If the osm2pgsql code saw even a name tag on the relation then > it would ignore the tags on the outer ring. The recent code now looks at > the outer ring tags even if the relation has a name (it seems the > editors are encouraging people to put name tags on the relation to make > them easier to identify). Which is balls in JOSM, since that will happily display the note=* in absence of a name=* for a relation. What do the other 2 main editors do in that case? > - Missing nodes due to the minute diffs Out of osm2pgsql's control, but is this being worked on on some level? -- Lennard _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
