Am Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:25:35 -0400 schrieb Matthias Julius <[email protected]>:
> malenki <[email protected]> writes: > > This debate will never end and is therefore pointless. I doubt you > will convince many people to switch to a different MUA just to spare > you from duplicates. This was from beginning not my intention. > Some people don't even have the choice. Has nobody come up with a > plugin for MS Outlook, yet, that implements proper list handling? But I still don't know why they shouldn't be able to remove all the adresses except the list-adress when using reply-to-all. Carelessness, lazyness, ignorance, stubborness..? > > But what I maybe did not express well enough was: how can the MUA > > decide if the CC-to/Send-to duplicate should be removed or the > > duplicate from ML? Sometimes there are even triplikates (can one > > call that so?) sent... > > I guess the first to arrive wins. Unfortunately, this is usually the > direct mail. This is annoying when one uses list headers to sort > mail. Maybe the best will be: rm -rf $duplicates So I won't get any list-mail offlist and I won't complain anymore. If really some interesting things have been in some of these mails they maybe will be quoted in some of the next. ^^ Gruß malenki _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
