Stefan de Konink wrote: > We can solve all issues (again) and see what happens in a month. > But we can already check if the revisions of the objects were made > using [the program that shall not be named].
Or you could actually read the code and tell me where amf_controller is writing to the database without undergoing the model's usual integrity checks. Because AFAIK they are exactly the same as those in the XML API and there is no, repeat no, basis for you to make snitty little insinuations like this. Line 594 of amf_controller is where you should start looking. Oh yeah, you're too lazy to make the effort to read Ruby code, I remember from last time. Sheesh. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/relations-refering-to-deleted-objects-tp5090823p5102750.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
