On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Eric Wolf wrote:
Yes. I realized after I sent the email that I meant to say ODbL but then read more on the wiki about the current license OSM uses: CC- BY-SA. Yet the end result is the same. The USGS is funded to produce public domain data. So either Congress or the President have to change what the USGS is funded to do or OSM can only continue take data upstream from our efforts.
When I started working on OSM, I wondered why some people thought all of the data should be PD. It wasn't until later that I realized that this is one of the good reasons for it.
I wish there was a way for a user to flag all their contributions as PD in the database, so that if a node or way came from a PD source and only had been worked on by PD users, then it would still be PD. I'm sure if it were that simple, it probably would be in the works already.
I've sent in a few fixes to geonames.usgs.gov for local features when they had the wrong name or were significantly out of place. I wish there could be an easy way for me to feed my OSM updates on GNIS objects back to the USGS. For example, a lot of minor alignment like moving the school POI from the street to the school grounds, etc.
What would be REALLY cool would be a Potlatch or Mapzen-style OSM editor hosted by the USGS, where a user could do updates to OSM and GNIS simultaneously. It could tie in to their OSM account like Mapzen does, for full OSM editing. And it could send a diff of their edits on GNIS objects to a usgs reviewer for basic quality control, for updates into GNIS.
I think a lot of people would feel really good about not only contributing to a community project, but also to an official government database too.
- Alan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
