Tom, Then, what is the cause of the difference in the traces shown in both scenarios?
You can take a look directly in the area of this example: http://osm.org/go/MaJKO0HQm-- Regards, Julio Costa Zambelli OpenStreetMap Chile [email protected] http://www.openstreetmap.cl/ Cel: +56(9)89981083 Postal: Casilla 9002, Correo 3, Viña del Mar, Chile On 9 March 2011 11:14, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/03/11 14:05, Julio Costa Zambelli wrote: > > > Two screenshots with the same area in P1 and P2. > > > > P1 http://img10.imageshack.us/i/32156248.png/ > > > > P2 http://img3.imageshack.us/i/87677289.png/ (The are two trace pieces > > shown near the selected node, and one right next to the Bing logo) > > > > The P1 method obviously works better. Can it be implemented in P2? > > Absolutely not. > > It shouldn't matter anyway - exactly the same data is available through > both apis. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://compton.nu/ >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
