On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote:
> On 14.04.2011, at 12:10, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > To make the PBF stuff from Scott easier to use from C++ I have added a 
> > Makefile
> > and Debian config in my fork at https://github.com/joto/OSM-binary . This 
> > gives
> > you a /usr/lib/libosmpbf.a and the include files in /usr/include/osmpbf. If 
> > you
> > use Debian/Ubuntu you can have it all in a libosmpbf-dev package.
> 
> 
> I see that you changed the license of the proto files to LGPL. I already 
> mailed Scott a few weeks ago about the license and asked him if he could 
> remove the GPL header since IMO it doesn't make sense to use a copyleft 
> license in a proto buf file. First, it is not software but a data format 
> description that get transformed into code and second, it is a specification 
> which should be licensed more liberal. I would prefer CC0.

Scott had already changed it to LGPL. I just changed two places that still said
GPL to make it consistent.

I agree that thats probably something that should have been released into the
public domain, but LGPL is fine with me, it doesn't really have any 
restrictions.

> Did you talked with Scott about the license?

No.

Jochen
-- 
Jochen Topf  [email protected]  http://www.remote.org/jochen/  +49-721-388298


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to