On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:03:29PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote: > Am 28.04.2011 16:11, schrieb Oliver Tonnhofer: > >On 28.04.2011, at 16:00, Martijn van Exel wrote: > >>Interesting, this totally uproots my firm conviction that SAX parsing is > >>always more time- and memory-efficient than tree/DOM-based parsing. > > From my experience the expat-sax immplementation is faster then the > libxml sax-parser.
I benchmarked it when developing Osmium and for OSM files expat was about 10% faster than libxml2. Jochen -- Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
