Stefan Keller wrote:
Right. In fact - it's currently a programmers nightmare: It took us in
OSM-in-a-box several months of development.
I already argued earlier for an own geometry type. I proposed (and
still do) to choose the "Simple Features" geometry schema from OGC.
This roughly translates to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/The_Future_of_Areas/Areas_on_Nodes
and would have the disadvantages listed on that page (e.g. no re-using
of edges; difficulties in handling very large polygons).
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
