On 17.08.2011, at 20:01, [email protected] wrote: > but what is the difference between wmts and wmsc - they do the same, dont > they? both deliver tiles ... its a kind of weird for me :)
With WMS-C you address tiles by their bounding box, with WMTS by their x/y tile coordinate. > Is TMS the same like my mapnik-tirex-based tile server or is it more like wms > with requests via url... i mean do i make the same getcapabilities-stuff with > wmts and tms? With WMTS you have the same ?request=GetCapabilties URL as with WMS, but with service=WMTS instead of WMS. TMS looks like /tms/1.0.0/mylayer/04/123/456.png. TMS has also XML capabilities, like http://osm.omniscale.net/proxy/tms/1.0.0/ > I think i have to use the geowebcache and mapproxy software. > I need to set up a tiled wms filled with a osm database but the whole > standard non-standard webmapservices are confusing me. GeoWebCache and MapProxy are more flexible than Tirex, e.g. when you deal with other projections. Which (non)standard you use depends on your clients. I would go with TMS if you use OpenLayers as the client and use WMTS/TMS/WMS-C when you use desktop clients than support it. MapProxy also supports the full WMS standard (by combining, scaling and reprojecting cached tiles), so you can use it also in non-tiled clients. Regards, Oliver -- Oliver Tonnhofer | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG | http://omniscale.de http://mapproxy.org | https://bitbucket.org/olt | @oltonn _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
