Igor Podolskiy wrote > > Hello Walter, > thanks for your bug report and proposed solution. I'll take a look into > it, seems simple. > However, for the next time you may want to post a > proper patch (i.e. the output of diff -u or git diff). Or, even better, > register with Github and make a pull request. It's not that hard (it's > _way_ easier than hacking Osmosis sources, for that matter :)). > i know, but i had to make a decision: - take time to learn the "proper way" while other developers try to fix my problem - or say: "i got it" right now
so i chosed the quick&dirty way to save YOUR time. i'm not a developer (yet) so i will need some days to learn that github-stuff. but i'll try my best. > I don't have any experience with PostGIS 2.0 yet and I don't have a > working installation of it either. When I'm done with applying the > change, would you at least be willing to test the changed code? > that's ok. will do a git checkout (?) to get the actual version b.t.w. patched version is running fine (differential updates of live database) for many hours. Regards Walter aka wambacher @ Schlangenbad/Germany -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/osmosis-postgis-2-0-usage-of-legacy-function-namens-tp5234278p5713959.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
