On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 03:24:47PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > > That sounds reasonable. But we need to agree on what is valid and what is > > treated as invalid. In the testsuite of closed ways that I commited to > > github I defined an output for every case, but I'm not sure if the inputs > > are valid. My guess would be: > > > 1) Definitely valid > > OK > > > 2) valid > > Why do you need to reverse the winding order ? I thought that the WKT > convention
Winding order should not be changed IMHO. It might mean something in specific cases, who knowns? It could be an optional feature. Jochen -- Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
