On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > > On 12/04/12 07:50, Jochen Topf wrote: > >> That still isn't specific to Osmosis. Somebody else could implement this >> algorithm. Markus seems to have done so, albeit a bit differently. The >> algorithm should be documented somewhere and if you think there can be >> other algorithms, maybe this one should get a name. >> > > I'd call it the "Osmosis algorithm", and therefore name the header fields > "osmosis_...", to make clear that they are intended for this algorithm. - I > agree that it would be nice for the algorithm to be documented somewhere > but I'm loathe to make this a prerequisite for the proposed changes to > OSM-Binary because it will unnecessarily delay the process. I think I'm willing to call it a consensus. Thank you everyone for the discussion. And Frederik thank you for sending me a pull request. I've committed it as-is. I'm happy to go with osmosis_* for the fieldnames. It's the osmosis algorithm, and we can always add on other metadata fields in the future. I've merged the pull request and I think I've added the right changelog, maven, and debian glue for the new version and pushed the v1.3.0 tag to github. If I've missed anything, please send me a followup email. Scott
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
