Haha, yeah, Saman and I changed that from an earlier version. You know we're very much following the Potlatch, in-browser, beginning-user, casual-update kind of use cases and referring much to that if we're saying 'better'. Which doesn't mean we don't need to be very accurate in our communications.
On a more serious note, if we do iD right, we move the entire editor space forward. E. g. just looking into using taginfo for inline-documentation… not sure what else there could be outside of stimulation through competition ;-) I don't want to get ahead of the iD work as I know there's just a lot more ground work to be done right now but what are the improvements small and big that are going to help JOSM _and_ iD that we're seeing? On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 06.12.2012 20:54, John Firebaugh wrote: >> And Saman Bemel-Benrud started on iD design work and gave us a quick >> review of geo editors and literature: >> >> http://mapbox.com/osmdev/2012/12/06/designing-a-better-osm-editor/ > > A warm thank you to whoever possessed the humility to change the headline to > "Designing a New OSM Editor" somewhere between the first draft and the > current public version ;) > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev Alex Barth http://twitter.com/lxbarth tel (+1) 202 250 3633 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
