On 6 December 2012 15:54, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing Andy did say was that he'd like other people to review what he's > done to make sure he hasn't introduced regressions - he is probably best > placed to explain how he envisions that working.
There's two main things I'd like other people to review: 1) Performance. I'm interested to know how the generated XML compares with the original in terms of tiles per second. Yevaud has plenty of overhead, so long as there's not a substantial performance degradation. Anyone who can test performance of the two stylesheets, even only approximately using nik2img.py, would be doing a great service. 2) Visual changes. I've spotted a few typos in the conversion as I went along, but only for the places that I looked at (primarily London and Spaghetti Junction in Birmingham). If we can set up the style and get other people to check and compare against the current style, that would be great. I expect in some of the less-common features (e.g. highway construction, abandoned canals in tunnels) there could well be one or two typos in the stylesheet, e.g. a casing is 1 pixel too wide or a zoom level is off by one. Of course, neither of them are blockers for deploying on the tileserver, it's just more professional if we can fix them first, rather than dealing with things later! Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
