Toby / AJ: I just captured your reports on the issue queue:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/26 If anyone else has found issues like these, please report them right away on the GitHub project: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues Thanks! On Dec 19, 2012, at 4:18 PM, AJ Ashton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Toby Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > I was doing some poking around yesterday and noticed that county > borders (admin_levl=6) aren't being rendered at zoom 9 and 10. But I > do recall some confusion on the existing style between ways and > relations. I don't remember the details but there was some difference > between the zoom level at which ways and relations tagged with > admin_level=6 got rendered. Maybe this caused confusion when porting > to carto? Easy place to see this difference: > http://bl.ocks.org/d/4271706/#9.00/39.4664/-96.9125 > > This seems to be about boundary relation way members being individually (and > redundantly?) tagged with boundary=administrative. Some of the admin_level=6 > ways in this area [1] are tagged as boundary=administrative, and others are > tagless members of boundary relations. If you zoom out, the tagless ways > disappear at zoom level 10 and below. > > [1]: http://osm.org/go/T7OwGz3-- > > This commented out section of the stylesheet may be why the CartoCSS version > is different: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/admin.mss#L75-L85 > > -- > AJ Ashton > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev Alex Barth http://twitter.com/lxbarth tel (+1) 202 250 3633 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
