The TIGER argument is the only one I found sensible for having a merge function
just one click away. But one could argue that this is a local case.
Would be cool if one could personalize the functions available on the ID flower.
Le 13 octobre 2015 16:30:14 UTC+02:00, Bryan Housel <br...@7thposition.com> a
écrit :
>Large portions of the US TIGER import ended up heavily segmented, so
>merge happens to be really important for some places.
>
>
>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Gerd Petermann
><gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> yes, I contacted some editors and typically got positive feedback,
>> so it is clear to me that nobody intended to create unusable data.
>>
>> I just don't understand why iD offers a method to combine elements
>> when this is such a tricky thing. Why would a "beginner" need that?
>>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>dev mailing list
>dev@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
