Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote:
> You'd still have the full storage footprint on one machine, it just
> helps with the requirements on your read-only replica slaves.
Yes,. I imagine that this machine can be run on a central server and peaple
can use this one as a master.
> What is not possible is to centralize this. When doing updates what goes
> to the rendering tables depends on the osm2pgsql style, so your
> rendering table updates will not be the same as other people with a
> different style.
It is possible to centralize this if the database is fairly generic. I use
hstore-only tables with osm2pgsql all over the place. The table layout
required by a particular style can the be easily emulated using views.
Sven
--
"Thinking of using NT for your critical apps?
Isn't there enough suffering in the world?"
(Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street Journal)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
