Hi, On 06/18/2018 07:30 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > I think it is probably possible to create scenarios where all three > viewpoints (the two above and the 'no copyright issues involved' case) > are plausible interpretations.
I can certainly construct a primitive "machine learning" machine that can be "trained" with OSM data and that will nicely respond with that very OSM data very time I set it to work on the same geographical area ;) I have a hunch that in order to disprove that your machine learning installation and all it produces is a derived work, you would at least have to lay open the algorithms and the training data used. If someone has a proprietary machine and trains it with OSM data, then my default assumption would be that everything the machine ever outputs is derived from OSM, because how will I know that the machine doesn't simply store everything it sees during learning? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
