On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:42:59PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 has a 2.6.32 kernel but it backports the > > rtnl_link_stats64 structure that was introduced in 2.6.35, so we need to > > check whether it was defined instead of just guessing based on the kernel > > version number. > > > > Build-tested only, on 2.6.32-71.14.1.el6 (RHEL 6), > > linux-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.xs5.5.0.496.101 (XenServer 5.5.0), > > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.xs5.5.0.505.1024xen (XenServer 5.5.0 update 1), > > and upstream 2.6.18, 2.6.26, 2.6.29, 2.6.33, 2.6.34, 2.6.36, all for i386, > > plus 2.6.36 for x86-64. > > > > My machine's userspace headers have <linux/if_link.h> but not > > rtnl_link_stats64. ?I didn't test with other userspace headers. > > The problem that I ran into (and with this as well) is that the > userspace header check never finds rtnl_link_stats64 even if it > exists. So on my machine, which has 2.6.35 userspace and kernel, I > get:
When I edited my /usr/include/linux/if_link.h by hand to include rtnl_link_stats64, everything built fine. So something else must be in play here. What's in config.log regarding rtnl_link_stats64? What distro is on your machine? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org
