I expected that since the flow with the lower priority will never be
matched over the higher one, it has no purpose and would not be added.
Hmm, on second glance, the protocol says that if you add an identical
flow that also has the same priority then the flow will just be replaced.
But, I don't think it says anything about this case. Sorry, I should
have confirmed that before posting.
That said, do you think these identical flows should be allowed?
- Derek
On 02/22/2011 03:43 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
I would expect that you can. What did you expect? What did you see? It's not
clear from this output if it's working or not, since neither counter shows a
value. Are you running traffic?
--Justin
On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Derek Cormier wrote:
Should I be able to add two identical wildcarded flows with different
priorities? I was talking with KK and he thinks this might be a bug. I always
assumed this was just the way it works. Here is my ovs-ofctl flow dump:
cookie=0x0, duration=94.608s, table_id=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
priority=5,dl_type=0x0005 actions=drop
cookie=0x0, duration=98.109s, table_id=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
priority=1,dl_type=0x0005 actions=drop
Thanks,
- Derek
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org
