On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 12:21:59PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here, I think that kernel style calls for && to be at end of line: > >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&& opt_len == 8) { > > > > Ditto here: > >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? && swkey->tp_src != > >> htons(NDISC_NEIGHBOUR_ADVERTISEMENT)) > > I usually put && at the end of the line because I find it easier to > read; I don't think that kernel style prescribes one way or the other > (there were some arguments on LKML a while back about whether it > should). In these cases I did it this way to avoid long lines.
OK. I thought I saw this in Documentation/CodingStyle at one point but it isn't there. Never mind then. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_openvswitch.org
