On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:39:27PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > The specification says that a fault should be signaled when 3.5 * > ccm_interval milliseconds have passed. This commit respects that > requirement, possibly increasing the responsiveness of fault > detection slightly.
Would you mind writing this as cfmi->ccm_interval_ms * 7 / 2 instead of cfmi->ccm_interval_ms * 3.5? I realize that the latter is probably efficient enough these days, but it still bothers me a little. Otherwise looks fine to me. Thank you! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
