On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:52:34AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > ?And > > it's not just stability that this mode brings to the table, right? > > It's additionally symmetry. ?If it was only stability that was > > important then we could just disable rebalancing and be done with it. > > I don't fully understand this point. There isn't additional symmetry > beyond the happen-stance choice of the symmetric L4 hash function. > Symmetry isn't really a requirement at any rate. What do you mean > precisely? > > The only requirement is giving the control some sort of consistency > about which flows are assigned to which slave.
Perhaps I misunderstood then. Never mind on this point, in that case. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
