On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:05:39AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > What motivated this change? > > Just defensive coding. I noticed it when looking over the patch > again. If n_stb_slaves is 0, e.g. there are no enabled slaves. It's > better to choose something (e.g. the active slave) instead of trigger > a divide by zero.
I hadn't noticed the division by zero. Good spotting, thanks. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
