On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> In future patches, lacp status will need to be written to the
> database in a rate limited manner.  It doesn't make sense to run
> two parallel rate limiters.  This patch renames the CFM rate
> limiter to something more generic.

Looks good to me.  Thank you!
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to