That would be my fault. Patch looks good, thanks. Ethan
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > vswitchd/vswitch.xml | 6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml > index 4cdc1b1..a518cf7 100644 > --- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml > +++ b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml > @@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ > > <column name="lacp"> > <p>Configures LACP on this port. LACP allows directly connected > - switchs to negotiate which links may be bonded. LACP may be > enabled > - on non-bonded ports for the benefit of any switchs they may be > + switches to negotiate which links may be bonded. LACP may be > enabled > + on non-bonded ports for the benefit of any switches they may be > connected to. <code>active</code> ports are allowed to initiate > LACP > negotiations. <code>passive</code> ports are allowed to participate > in LACP negotiations initiated by a remote switch, but not allowed > to > @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ > <dd> When <code>true</code>, configures this <ref table="Port"/> to > require successful LACP negotiations to enable any slaves. > Defaults to <code>false</code> which safely allows LACP to be used > - with switchs that do not support the protocol.</dd> > + with switches that do not support the protocol.</dd> > </dl> > </column> > </group> > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
