Good idea.  I just resent the patch with that version number.

--Justin


On May 26, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> vlan-maint is a lot closer to 1.1 than to 1.0, so I'd suggest a version
> number that hints at that.  1.0.99?  This would also eliminate the
> potential tag confusion.
> 
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:17:00AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Sorry, I should have indicated that this was for the "vlan-maint"
>> branch.  The code exists somewhere between 1.0.2 and the final version
>> of 1.1.0, so I'm suggesting 1.0.3 to provide a unique version.
>> 
>> We have a "v1.0.3" git tag, which we should probably remove since it
>> was never used and is potentially confusing.
>> 
>> --Justin
>> 
>> 
>> On May 26, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> 
>>> ---
>>> configure.ac |    2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>>> index 04834c2..a3d75e2 100644
>>> --- a/configure.ac
>>> +++ b/configure.ac
>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>>> # limitations under the License.
>>> 
>>> AC_PREREQ(2.64)
>>> -AC_INIT(openvswitch, 1.1.0pre2, [email protected])
>>> +AC_INIT(openvswitch, 1.0.3, [email protected])
>>> NX_BUILDNR
>>> AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([datapath/datapath.c])
>>> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
>>> -- 
>>> 1.7.1
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to