Thanks, I pushed this.

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:15:52PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Looks good.
> 
> Ethan
> 
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 15:56, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The "lock" request requires the lock name to be an <id> but it is shown as
> > <string> in the "assert" operation. ?This corrects the "assert"
> > specification and fixes the suggested naming convention (since ":" is not
> > valid in an <id>).
> >
> > This commit also updates the implementation to match the specification.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jeremy Stribling <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > ?ovsdb/SPECS ? ? ? | ? ?4 ++--
> > ?ovsdb/execution.c | ? ?2 +-
> > ?2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ovsdb/SPECS b/ovsdb/SPECS
> > index e2898c2..5bdb974 100644
> > --- a/ovsdb/SPECS
> > +++ b/ovsdb/SPECS
> > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ The "locked" and "stolen" notifications (see below) 
> > report
> > ?asynchronous changes to ownership.
> >
> > ?The scope of a lock is a database server, not a database hosted by
> > -that server. ?A naming convention, such as "<db-name>:<lock-name>",
> > +that server. ?A naming convention, such as "<db-name>__<lock-name>",
> > ?can effectively limit the scope of a lock to a particular database.
> >
> > ?locked
> > @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ assert
> > ?Request object members:
> >
> > ? ? "op": "assert" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? required
> > - ? ?"lock": <string> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? required
> > + ? ?"lock": <id> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? required
> >
> > ?Result object members:
> >
> > diff --git a/ovsdb/execution.c b/ovsdb/execution.c
> > index 9e3a8d0..675c1c3 100644
> > --- a/ovsdb/execution.c
> > +++ b/ovsdb/execution.c
> > @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ ovsdb_execute_assert(struct ovsdb_execution *x, struct 
> > ovsdb_parser *parser,
> > ?{
> > ? ? const struct json *lock_name;
> >
> > - ? ?lock_name = ovsdb_parser_member(parser, "lock", OP_STRING);
> > + ? ?lock_name = ovsdb_parser_member(parser, "lock", OP_ID);
> > ? ? if (!lock_name) {
> > ? ? ? ? return NULL;
> > ? ? }
> > --
> > 1.7.4.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to