I'm becoming a big fan of running checks automatically on every build, as we do with "sparse" on C code when C=1 is provided on the command line. Probably we'd need to first fix all the existing pylint problems though.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:57:42PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > pylint will complain about some of these things. It would be good > to kick it off, when available, when builds are run (or at least on > a "make check"). I've had it on my to-do list for a while, but > haven't gotten around to it... > > --Justin > > > On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > 'tuple' is a Python built-in function, so it's best to avoid using it as a > > variable name. > > > > Suggested-by: Reid Price <r...@nicira.com> > > --- > > python/ovs/stream.py | 7 +++---- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/python/ovs/stream.py b/python/ovs/stream.py > > index c1ce422..16e383a 100644 > > --- a/python/ovs/stream.py > > +++ b/python/ovs/stream.py > > @@ -88,15 +88,14 @@ class Stream(object): > > return 0, Stream(sock, name, bind_path, status) > > > > @staticmethod > > - def open_block(tuple): > > + def open_block((error, stream)): > > """Blocks until a Stream completes its connection attempt, either > > - succeeding or failing. 'tuple' should be the tuple returned by > > + succeeding or failing. (error, stream) should be the tuple > > returned by > > Stream.open(). Returns a tuple of the same form. > > > > Typical usage: > > - error, stream = Stream.open_block(Stream.open("tcp:1.2.3.4:5"))""" > > + error, stream = > > Stream.open_block(Stream.open("unix:/tmp/socket"))""" > > > > - error, stream = tuple > > if not error: > > while True: > > error = stream.connect() > > -- > > 1.7.4.4 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > dev@openvswitch.org > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev