On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:02:34PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reported-by: Janis Hamme <[email protected]> > > This doesn't make a lot of sense to me: I think the only real use for > tap devices is for the userspace datapath where they resemble internal > ports. Since the userspace datapath already does this conversion > automatically, I think the right thing to do is just remove tap > devices from the documentation.
That's reasonable for "master" at least. Janis (or anyone else), is there any particular reason you want to add a tap interface to your bridge? In other words, is there any reason to continue supporting this feature? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
