On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast > and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip > of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast. Currently this > will match the multicast tunnel but in reality the unicast tunnel > should probably be considered more specific. This is actually a > common situation in protocols that use a combination of multicast > for flooding and unicast for responses. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> Should we have separate key_* counters for multicast tunnels? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
