On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:45:59PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > >> On some platforms, the in6_addr structure is made up of 16- or 32-bit > >> members. Depending on the members of the "flow" structure, this can > >> lead to holes in the middle. Moving the IPv6 addresses to the middle > >> fixes that on these platforms. > > > > Should we move the IPv6 addresses just after the 64-bit members, > > instead, in case someone gets the bright idea of adding 64-bit members > > to in6_addr? > > Sounds good. I've updated the patch.
We could move it all the way to the beginning, in case someone gets the bright idea of adding an __int128 member :-) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
