* Brian Haley ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 06:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > The comment on this function says that negative values indicate errors, and
> > the callers assume that too, but in fact it was returning positive errno
> > values, which are indistinguishable from valid fd numbers.
>
> > @@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ inet_open_passive(int style, const char *target, int
> > default_port,
> > goto error;
> > }
> > if (sin.sin_family != AF_INET || sin_len != sizeof sin) {
> > + error = EAFNOSUPPORT;
>
> -EAFNOSUPPORT, right?
The error path then does:
return -error;
Bit confusing, but more as a patch than the end result.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
