On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:00:28PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > The 'tp_addr' field name is inappropriate because its not an > address, it's the transport port. Therefore tp is sufficient. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <[email protected]>
My intention in inventing the dl_, nw_, and tp_ prefixes in struct flow way back when was for them to stand for "data link", "network", and "transport", the names of layer 2 through 4. So "tp" seems a little truncated to me. How about "tp_port"? Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
