OK, I removed the question marks and applied the other fixes.

Thanks,

Ben.

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:48:46PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> I don't think the question marks add much and they look a bit funny.  Don't
> feel strongly about it thought.
> 
> OFPT_FLOW_MOD in->is confusing
> 
> In the table "match on out port?" -> "match on out_port?" to be consistent
> with the description above.
> 
> Otherwise looks good,
> 
> Ethan
> 
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 15:53, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm tired of trying to figure these out all over again each time I think
> > about it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> > ---
> >  DESIGN |   71
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/DESIGN b/DESIGN
> > index c53a8ea..13f3e9f 100644
> > --- a/DESIGN
> > +++ b/DESIGN
> > @@ -20,6 +20,77 @@ to 'internal' ports whose port numbers are less than
> > OFPP_MAX, we interpret
> >  OFPP_LOCAL as a physical port and support OFPAT_ENQUEUE on it as well.
> >
> >
> > +OFPT_FLOW_MOD
> > +=============
> > +
> > +The OpenFlow 1.0 specification for the behavior of OFPT_FLOW_MOD in
> > +confusing.  The following table summarizes the Open vSwitch
> > +implementation of its behavior in the following categories:
> > +
> > +    - "match on priority?": Whether the flow_mod acts only on flows
> > +      whose priority matches that included in the flow_mod message.
> > +
> > +    - "match on out_port?": Whether the flow_mod acts only on flows
> > +      that output to the out_port included in the flow_mod message (if
> > +      out_port is not OFPP_NONE).
> > +
> > +    - "updates flow_cookie?": Whether the flow_mod changes the
> > +      flow_cookie of the flow or flows that it matches to the
> > +      flow_cookie included in the flow_mod message.
> > +
> > +    - "updates OFPFF_ flags?": Whether the flow_mod changes the
> > +      OFPFF_SEND_FLOW_REM flag of the flow or flows that it matches to
> > +      the setting included in the flags of the flow_mod message.
> > +
> > +    - "honors OFPFF_CHECK_OVERLAP?": Whether the OFPFF_CHECK_OVERLAP
> > +      flag in the flow_mod is significant.
> > +
> > +    - "updates idle_timeout?" and "updates hard_timeout?": Whether the
> > +      idle_timeout and hard_timeout in the flow_mod, respectively,
> > +      have an effect on the flow or flows matched by the flow_mod.
> > +
> > +    - "updates idle timer?": Whether the flow_mod resets the per-flow
> > +      timer that measures how long a flow has been idle.
> > +
> > +    - "updates hard timer?": Whether the flow_mod resets the per-flow
> > +      timer that measures how long it has been since a flow was
> > +      modified.
> > +
> > +    - "zeros counters?": Whether the flow_mod resets per-flow packet
> > +      and byte counters to zero.
> > +
> > +    - "sends flow_removed message?": Whether the flow_mod generates a
> > +      flow_removed message for the flow or flows that it affects.
> > +
> > +An entry labeled "yes" means that the flow mod type does have the
> > +indicated behavior, "---" means that it does not, an empty cell means
> > +that the property is not applicable, and other values are explained
> > +below the table.
> > +
> > +                                           MODIFY          DELETE
> > +                              ADD  MODIFY  STRICT  DELETE  STRICT
> > +                              ===  ======  ======  ======  ======
> > +match on priority?            ---    ---     yes     ---     yes
> > +match on out port?            ---    ---     ---     yes     yes
> > +updates flow_cookie?          yes    yes     yes
> > +updates OFPFF_SEND_FLOW_REM?  yes     +       +
> > +honors OFPFF_CHECK_OVERLAP?   yes     +       +
> > +updates idle_timeout?         yes     +       +
> > +updates hard_timeout?         yes     +       +
> > +resets idle timer?            yes     +       +
> > +resets hard timer?            yes    yes     yes
> > +zeros counters?               yes     +       +
> > +sends flow_removed message?   ---    ---     ---      %       %
> > +
> > +(+) "modify" and "modify-strict" only take these actions when they
> > +    create a new flow, not when they update an existing flow.
> > +
> > +(%) "delete" and "delete_strict" generates a flow_removed message if
> > +    the deleted flow or flows have the OFPFF_SEND_FLOW_REM flag set.
> > +    (Each controller can separately control whether it wants to
> > +    receive the generated messages.)
> > +
> > +
> >  Multiple Table Support
> >  ======================
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.2.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to