> I was suggesting an optional simplification. Obviously when I wrote > the existing code I had the idea of back-to-back requests in mind, or > I wouldn't have written it that way. But the only existing client > only sends a single request per program execution, so multiple > back-to-back requests just isn't an important case. > > The existing code is also fine, if you prefer it.
Alright sounds good. Since we're adding python support, I suspect that we may have scripts which may send multiple requests in batches so I'll go ahead and leave the loop. Ethan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
