On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> When OVS_VPORT_ATTR_NAME is specified and dp_ifindex is nonzero, the
> logical behavior would be for the vport name lookup scope to be limited
> to the specified datapath, but in fact the dp_ifindex value was ignored.
> This commit causes the search scope to be honored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> ---
>  datapath/datapath.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
> index 23fb1dc..bb96967 100644
> --- a/datapath/datapath.c
> +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,9 @@ static struct vport *lookup_vport(struct net *net,
>                vport = ovs_vport_locate(net, 
> nla_data(a[OVS_VPORT_ATTR_NAME]));
>                if (!vport)
>                        return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +               if (ovs_header->dp_ifindex &&
> +                   ovs_header->dp_ifindex != get_dpifindex(vport->dp))
> +                       return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>                return vport;
>        } else if (a[OVS_VPORT_ATTR_PORT_NO]) {
>                u32 port_no = nla_get_u32(a[OVS_VPORT_ATTR_PORT_NO]);
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>

Looks good. Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>

> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to