On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:00:44AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:20:10AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:14:40AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > I think that there are also some semantic differences between the VLAN > > > VID field that we implement currently, which is based on OF1.0, and > > > the VLAN VID field in OF1.2. I'm not sure how we should deal with > > > those. > > > > I expect that there are a few such differences between OXM and the current > > implementation. My plan is to get code in place to the point where we can > > start sending messages. Code that as much as possible uses the existing > > implementation. Then to focus on the corner cases. > > > > As you may have noticed, part of my plan is to get patches out as they > > are done rather than waiting to have a complete working implementation. > > Primarily this is for review; so I can get feedback along the way; and so > > you don't get overloaded by a huge patchset later on. > > Understood, that makes sense. > > The most important issue to me while adding OF1.[123] support is to > avoid regressions in OF1.0 support.
Understood, I'll try to be careful :) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
