On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:09:25AM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <[email protected]>
This is a good idea (I didn't realize we didn't already allow OXM_*)
but I don't think it goes far enough. I believe that, with this
patch, bits of code other than reg_load will accept OXM field names
but then silently generate bad actions, because they will use
nxm_header blindly without noticing that it is zero.
I've got another approach in mind, so please look over my
counterproposal:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-June/018354.html
Thanks,
Ben.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
