On Jun 28, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I don't understand why the priority field sort order is the opposite > of other fields. I'd drop that.
I had suggested this after seeing some of his initial output. I imagine most people will just run "--sort" and expect to see flows sorted from highest to lowest priority. I realize this introduces an inconsistency, so I was sort of on the fence about it. It sounds like you have a stronger preference than I, so I'll defer to you. (I still think the secondary sort should always sort highest to lowest by priority, though. Thoughts?) --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
