On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:03AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:43:16AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:24:06AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > When OF11+ only actions is introduced, ofpacts_put_openflow10() will be > > > unable to handle all ofp-actions. So allow it return error in that case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamah...@valinux.co.jp> > > > > I'd prefer to make it possible for OpenFlow 1.0 to handle all OF1.1 > > actions, by introducing extensions for them as necessary. > > I see. So the problem is how to encode instructions/actions. > How about the following?
I've been thinking about this stuff for a while (not ignoring you; sorry it has taken for a while). I think the answer is basically "I'm not sure yet." So, how about this for now: when an action or an instruction cannot be encoded in OF1.0, simply do not encode it at all, that is, omit it from the actions. When I have a proper answer later, we can fix it up. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
