* Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote: > On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote: > >> They are different, and not as flexible as the RHEL ones. > >> > >> Let me give the RHEL ones with the latest OVS a try on Fedora and see > >> what happens there, and based on the result of that I'll see about fixing > >> these > >> up as well. > > > > You should look at the Fedora packages. They won't build the kmod, but > > have all the Fedora-isms worked out. > > > I was thinking that's the way to go. If it's possible to unify the RHEL and > Fedora > ones upstream, I'll see about doing that. Otherwise, I'll submit patches for > Fedora specific spec files.
Be prepared for systemd vs sysvinit differences at the very least. Also there's some packaging changes that make different (Build)Requires to be sure to have the right libraries and/or headers. Here's the F18 spec file: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/openvswitch.git/tree/openvswitch.spec?id=932d11b08c8d552dac7c34d8fa8ee4c88fac16d6 thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
