On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:39:42PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > However, the names are unfortunately very close. Hopefully, most of > the skb priorities are skb_priority now, it might be a good idea to > call these rule_priority or similar.
If we find it confusing enough, we could even use sparse to mark skb_priority values as a distinct type with __bitwise__. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
