On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thanks for cleaning up the tunnel infrastructure, it is long over due. > Shouldn't this go to the upstream mailing list ([email protected]) > instead > of being on the OVS mailing list? If you get it submitted right now it > could make > it in for the 3.8 merge window. > > Thanks. I wanted to get initial review done on ovs-dev then will post it to netdev. > There are also the IPv6 tunnels that need the same common code. They are > just > as bloated. I remember an earlier attempt at the common code, you might > want > to compare with it. > > Yes, I am planning at looking at ipv6. > A somewhat related issue is that operational state on tunnels is not fully > implemented. I had an earlier patch: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/226948 > but the linear search of tunnels on device caused it to be rejected. > Having a common hash list from ifindex back in the tunnel common code > would make this easier and faster. > thanks for ref. --Pravin.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
