On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:55:06PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > The old algorithm tries to converge to 0, despite it would mean a very > unbalanced situation. 1 is a more desirable goal. Fortunately rebalancing > never > worked, so this never caused a problem. But my previous patch needs it. > It was tested together with my previous patch. > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@citrix.com>
One of the goals of the heuristic here (whether it was correctly implemented or not) was to include hysteresis, that is, to avoid moving for tiny improvements. As I read it, your new heuristic here doesn't do that, so it will move for an improvement from 1.001 to 0.99999. Could you add some hysteresis? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
