On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:24:22PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: >> > >> > Seems reasonable, thanks. >> >> I pushed this to master. I am not pushing the second patch in the >> series as it introduces a bug. I will think about a better solution >> for that sometime later. > > Out of curiosity, what is the bug?
I was wrong when I said "introduces a bug"(I thought it did). The patch fixes the case when we first configure a bridge followed by a port. But when we try and configure a port first and then follow it up to configure a bridge, we try and configure the bridge twice (so the RTNETLINK exists error still comes up). The correct thing to say is that the patch only solves half the problem. So I will try and come up with a patch that handles both the above mentioned cases. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
