Good point. I agree.  This patch is only to fix a bug at hand. My
understanding is that we will change to use skb_get_rxhash() after Pravin's
tunnel patches are upstreamed.


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo) <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 1:58 , ext Andy Zhou wrote:
> > diff --git a/datapath/tunnel.c b/datapath/tunnel.c
> > index 9102786..18c3622 100644
> > --- a/datapath/tunnel.c
> > +++ b/datapath/tunnel.c
> > @@ -186,7 +186,9 @@ u16 ovs_tnl_get_src_port(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >       int low;
> >       int high;
> >       unsigned int range;
> > -     u32 hash = OVS_CB(skb)->flow->hash;
> > +     struct sw_flow_key *pkt_key = OVS_CB(skb)->pkt_key;
> > +     u32 hash = jhash2((const u32 *)pkt_key,
> > +                     0, sizeof(*pkt_key) / sizeof(u32));
> >
>
> Wouldn't skb_get_rxhash() be a lot cheaper and enough for this purpose?
>
>   Jarno
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to