On 25 October 2013 22:10, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > Please consider trimming context more aggressively, it makes the > comments easier to see. >
OK, sure. OFPQT_NONE was removed from later standards because it was never defined > and it didn't make any sense to define it (why would you define a > property to say there are no properties?). > > I can leave OFPQT_EXPERIMENTER defined if you like, it doesn't hurt > anything. > I'm not too fussed---the reason I asked is more to get an idea for what is usually done in this case.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
